Educational estimates onlyNot financial or legal advice. Consult a startup attorney.
Anti-dilution provisions

Full ratchet vs weighted average

Model a down round and compare three anti-dilution mechanisms side by side. See exactly how much extra ownership the original investor claims and how much your founder stake takes the hit.

Form ED-5 / Down Round Anti-Dilution

Compare anti-dilution mechanisms

$
$
$
$
MechanismFounder %Original investor %New investor %
No anti-dilution
Rare in practice
63.5%12.7%23.8%
Broad-based weighted average
Market standard
62.3%14.4%23.4%
Full ratchet
Most punitive to founders
54.8%24.7%20.5%
No anti-dilution

Rare in practice

Investor takes the same proportional dilution as everyone else in the down round. Almost never agreed to outside angel rounds and friends-and-family deals.

Broad-based weighted average

Market standard

Conversion price adjusts using a formula: CP2 = CP1 x (A + B) / (A + C). A is fully diluted shares before the new issue, B is shares that would have been issued at the old price, C is shares actually issued at the new price.

Full ratchet

Most punitive

Conversion price drops to the new round price, regardless of size. A tiny down round triggers full repricing. Founders bear all the dilution. Push hard against this.

§FAQ

Anti-dilution FAQ

Anti-dilution provisions adjust an early investor's effective conversion price in a down round so they keep more ownership than the math would otherwise give them. Common in any priced round. The protection comes at founders' expense: extra shares are issued to the protected investor, diluting everyone else.

Updated 2026-04-28